*Publication list separated as follows:
(List entries in each of the categories in reverse
chronological order. Number sequentially throughout the section.
- Books
- Chapters in Books
- Refereed Journal Papers - Published
- Refereed Journal Papers - Accepted
- Refereed Journal Papers - Submitted
- Refereed Conference/Workshop Papers
- UnRefereed Conference/Workshop Papers
- Technical Reports
- Other Publications
- Patents and Invention Disclosures
- Software Artifacts
- Video Productions
Papers published in multiple places (e.g., first a tech
report, then a journal or conference paper, then included in
an anthology) should be cited only once, in the section of
highest significance, with the following notation as
appropriate:
"Originally published as , and later
included in ."
*Information reflecting the candidate's external reputation -
include citations and awards, all invited papers and colloquia
at professional meetings and conferences, seminars and
colloquia at universities, industry, etc. (provide date and
location for each);
*Professional activities outside the University - include
outside committee work, consulting, membership in and offices
held in professional societies and associations, editorial
duties and major activities in professional societies and
meetings, participation in student or faculty organizations,
committees, and/or ad hoc appointments, participation in
civic, regional and/or national service organizations (please
give dates).
#Contract and grant support - include funding which the
candidate has received in the past, that which is current, and
proposals which have been submitted but not yet funded.
Gifts may be included in this section as appropriate.
#Letters of recommendation from current Carnegie Mellon faculty.
#+Letters of recommendation from people outside Carnegie Mellon
who are qualified to speak on the faculty member's work.
*Candidate should provide list of suggested names, including current addresses and email, to the chair, for final selection of recommenders.
Letters should be preceded by a list of those from whom letters
were requested.
Chair should indicate the relationship of each
recommender to the candidate, i.e., PhD thesis advisor, co-author, co-PI,
collaborator, program manager, or other as appropriate.
#Letters from students,
preceded by a list of those from whom letters were requested, including:
- Students suggested by the candidate.
Usually no more than six student
names, equally divided among grad and undergrad.
- Students selected by the department.
Include all current and former
PhD students. Masters students may be included at the discretion of the
department.
- Randomly selected students.
A randomly generated list of students
from the roster of courses taught in the past, usually ~3 from each course
for the past two years.
*Available evidence bearing on the quality of the candidate's
teaching performance (excluding letters from students, which
appear above). Include a list of courses taught (show units
and class level, number of students taught, and date), results
of Faculty Course Evaluations (Overall course and instructor
rating)
*Available evidence bearing on the candidate's contributions
to education, apart from classroom performance and
supervision; i.e., curriculum development, new programs,
unsolicited evaluations by colleagues, teaching materials,
textbooks, lecture notes, examinations, original laboratory
exercises.
*Student Supervision - candidate should provide lists of current
students (including expected thesis titles and dates of
completion), former students (including thesis titles, dates of
completion, and present occupation/employer, and any thesis
committee service or other supervision, as appropriate.
*Service and committee work within the University.
*to be provided by the candidate
#to be provided/solicited by the department
+Not required for reappointments at or below the rank of assistant
professor/research scientist.
Last updated Fall 2001.
Maintained by SHARON R. BURKS