VARIATIONS:
Redundancy:
- Once a service company swap has
been made, customers are not allowed to change companies again . . . vs.
- The subscribers cannot switch
again to another provider . . .
Again implies that a swap has
already been made. (1) states that assumption explicitly, while
(2) doesn't.
- in 14 days vs. anytime
within 14 days
By default, in 14 days
implies the concept of anytime.
Syntactic variation:
- cannot vs. are not allowed to
Synonomy
- within the first three months vs. for the first three months
- call quality vs. voice quality
- change vs. switch
- although vs. but
- companies vs. providers
Inverse relationship
- if problems such as poor call
quality are experienced vs. if
they are not satisfied with services like voice quality
OTHER ISSUES:
- we should annotate words we didn't annotate in IL1 (prepositions,
aux., conjunctions, etc.) ... or will we deal with them in another way?
- alternative representations for IL2 other than dependency trees?