Monday 4/19/93 ; WeH 7220 ; 3:00 pm Lonnie will give a practice talk for his thesis proposal. _____________________________________________________________________________ Type: Thesis Proposal Who: Lonnie Chrisman Topic: Representing and Reasoning about Modeling Limitations Dates: 22-Apr-93 Time: 2:30 PM Place: WeH 4623 ABSTRACT World models used by A.I. systems for planning or reasoning about the world must necessarily be abstractions of reality. The world is too complex to model in complete detail. Any given model can always be made more faithful to reality by including more detail, but at some point the model becomes large, unwieldy, and hard to use. We are always forced to omit details even though they may be significant in certain situations. This work will examine the following thesis: * The explicit awareness of modeling limitations by a system allows world models to be used more effectively. I am developing a new probabilistic framework for representing and reasoning about the limitations of causal world models. The framework is used to derive a measure of how well-suited or poorly-suited a given model is for answering a given problem instance. A system might advantageously utilize this information in several different ways. For example, it might be used to detect when the world model at its current level of abstraction is insufficient for the task at hand, prompting the system to switch to an alternative model, to refine the current model to more detail, or to defer this particular problem for human assistance. During the proposal talk, I will discuss the framework and how it differs from more standard probabilistic approaches (such as Bayesian approaches). For the thesis, I propose to develop this framework to the point where it is useful, demonstrating an implementation in at least two application domains. The first will be a monitoring/diagnosis task based on a real Space Shuttle missions operations task. The second will be a temporal projection task requiring the coherent reasoning about actions at different levels of granularity. Thesis Committee: Tom Mitchell, Co-Chair Reid Simmons, Co-Chair Matt Mason Glenn Shafer, Princeton University A copy of this proposal has been posted in the CS Lounge.