<?xml version="1.0"?> 
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "mathml.dtd"> 
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="thesis.css"?> 
<html  
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"  
><head><title>5.4 Microchoice discussion</title> 
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" /> 
<meta name="generator" content="TeX4ht (http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/mn.html)" /> 
<meta name="originator" content="TeX4ht (http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/mn.html)" /> 
<!-- 3,early_,early^,xhtml,mozilla --> 
<meta name="src" content="thesis.tex" /> 
<meta name="date" content="2002-08-28 13:56:00" /> 
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="thesis.css" /> 
</head><body 
>
   <div class="crosslinks"><p class="noindent">[<a 
href="thesisse23.xml" >prev</a>] [<a 
href="thesisse23.xml#tailthesisse23.xml" >prev-tail</a>] [<a 
href="#tailthesisse24.xml">tail</a>] [<a 
href="thesisch5.xml#thesisse24.xml" >up</a>] </p></div>
   <h3 class="sectionHead"><span class="titlemark">5.4. </span> <a 
  name="x36-560005.4"></a>Microchoice discussion</h3>
<!--l. 2173--><p class="noindent">Microchoice bounds can be used in practice and do yield results comparable with
holdout set based techniques (see figure . <a 
href="thesisse55.xml#x76-1130015">12.3.5<!--tex4ht:ref: fig-microchoice-holdout --></a> and the surrounding section
for details). There are two significant insights which the microchoice bounds
provide.
</p><!--l. 2178--><p class="indent">
           </p><ol type="1" class="enumerate1" start="1" 
>
        <li class="enumerate"><a 
  name="x36-56002x1"></a>The &#x201C;cost&#x201D; of choices is made very explicit. The cost of a choice (in terms
        of sample complexity) is the log of the number of choices.
           </li>
        <li class="enumerate"><a 
  name="x36-56004x2"></a>It is possible to improve upon the Occam&#x2019;s Razor Bound (theorem  <a 
href="thesisse20.xml#x27-36001r1">4.6.1<!--tex4ht:ref: th-ORB --></a>)
        by using information from the sample set to infer properties (such as the
        choice tree) of the distribution <!--l. 2183--><math 
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" 
mode="inline">      <mrow 
><mi 
>D</mi></mrow></math>.
        This  can  be  done  <span 
class="ecti-1000">without  </span>any  explicit  knowledge  of  the  distribution  <!--l. 2184--><math 
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" 
mode="inline">
        <mrow 
><mi 
>D</mi></mrow></math>.</li></ol>
<!--l. 2185--><p class="nopar">
</p>
   <div class="newtheorem">
<!--l. 2186--><p class="noindent"><span class="head">
<a 
  name="x36-56005r1"></a>
  <span 
class="eccc-1000">P<small 
class="small-caps">R</small><small 
class="small-caps">O</small><small 
class="small-caps">B</small><small 
class="small-caps">L</small><small 
class="small-caps">E</small><small 
class="small-caps">M</small> </span>5.4.1<span 
class="eccc-1000">.</span></span>
</p><!--l. 2187--><p class="indent">   (Open) Is there a satisfying, natural bound for the continuous case? Preliminary
work and thoughts by several people has occurred, but nothing has yet come of it.
</p>
   </div>
<!--l. 2192--><p class="indent">
                                                                     

                                                                     
</p>
   <div class="crosslinks"><p class="noindent">[<a 
href="thesisse23.xml" >prev</a>] [<a 
href="thesisse23.xml#tailthesisse23.xml" >prev-tail</a>] [<a 
href="thesisse24.xml" >front</a>] [<a 
href="thesisch5.xml#thesisse24.xml" >up</a>] </p></div><a 
  name="tailthesisse24.xml"></a>  
</body> 
</html> 
