<?xml version="1.0"?> 
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "mathml.dtd"> 
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="thesis.css"?> 
<html  
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"  
><head><title>11.4 Conclusion</title> 
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" /> 
<meta name="generator" content="TeX4ht (http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/mn.html)" /> 
<meta name="originator" content="TeX4ht (http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/mn.html)" /> 
<!-- 3,early_,early^,xhtml,mozilla --> 
<meta name="src" content="thesis.tex" /> 
<meta name="date" content="2002-08-28 13:56:00" /> 
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="thesis.css" /> 
</head><body 
>
   <div class="crosslinks"><p class="noindent">[<a 
href="thesisse51.xml" >prev</a>] [<a 
href="thesisse51.xml#tailthesisse51.xml" >prev-tail</a>] [<a 
href="#tailthesisse52.xml">tail</a>] [<a 
href="thesisch11.xml#thesisse52.xml" >up</a>] </p></div>
   <h3 class="sectionHead"><span class="titlemark">11.4. </span> <a 
  name="x71-9700011.4"></a>Conclusion</h3>
<!--l. 4380--><p class="noindent">The theorems in this section give us a very general tools for composing training set and
test set based bounds. We used these general tools to construct a particular approach
which will be tested in the next chapter.
</p><!--l. 4384--><p class="indent">   There are two significant questions which need to be answered.
</p><!--l. 4386--><p class="indent">
           </p><ol type="1" class="enumerate1" start="1" 
>
        <li class="enumerate"><a 
  name="x71-97002x1"></a>Is the improvement of the particular approach worthwhile over a simple
        disjunction (technique 2 in the introduction)? Later empirical results will
        show that it can be worthwhile on real data, but the computational cost
        is non-negligible.
           </li>
        <li class="enumerate"><a 
  name="x71-97004x2"></a>Is the approach we used for combining bounds &#x201C;best&#x201D;? It is difficult to
        compare different approaches because strict dominance does not typically
        occur. Nonetheless, there are many other ways to compose train set and
        test set bounds and satisfy theorem  <a 
href="thesisse51.xml#x70-96002r2">11.3.2<!--tex4ht:ref: th-mtnt --></a>. Perhaps some other way is
        better on natural learning problems.</li></ol>
<!--l. 4395--><p class="nopar">
</p><!--l. 4397--><p class="indent">
                                                                     

                                                                     
</p>
   <div class="crosslinks"><p class="noindent">[<a 
href="thesisse51.xml" >prev</a>] [<a 
href="thesisse51.xml#tailthesisse51.xml" >prev-tail</a>] [<a 
href="thesisse52.xml" >front</a>] [<a 
href="thesisch11.xml#thesisse52.xml" >up</a>] </p></div><a 
  name="tailthesisse52.xml"></a>  
</body> 
</html> 
