As educators we teach formal external representations as a part of a design curriculum. In thermodynamics we teach the equations used to solve energy balance problems. In electrical engineering, we teach the formal representations of signals and systems. From a cognitive science standpoint we don't know how those educational practices support or don't support a student's ability to internalize the information carried in these representations. Another concern is when and how students learn to chain or link different representations in tackling design problems. Planning at a meta-cognitive level is suggested by the linkage between these four attributes, formal and informal, external and internal and the facility of moving between them.
While most engineering curricula make various assumptions about the issues above, very little seems to be actually known about the questions raised. We are interested in studies, more detailed hypotheses, and surveys of other fields that can cast insight into the issues that we have outlined.
Submission deadline: December 15, 2002
Send papers to:
Dr. Chuck Eastman
College of Architecture
Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, GA. 30332-0155
chuck.eastman@arch.gatech.edu